The international fast food chain KFC has recently been involved in a logistical and PR nightmare following a change in its Supply Chain provider.

Let us not dwell on the actors involved in this sorry saga but instead look behind the scenes of the issue and how it was dealt with.


The company had been using a specialist food distribution company but, following a reprocurement exercise, opted instead to use another supply chain solution putatively based on cost.


The result as many of you are aware was the mass closure of hundreds of KFC stores throughout the UK as they ran out of chicken due to issues with the distribution chain.

After an initial period of silence, the company then took out full page adverts in national newspapers to issue the amusing self-deprecating apology posted above.


They learned the hard way that ditching a specialist supplier based on cost has both financial and reputational consequences.


What is interesting though is that at no point did they seek to throw their new partner under the bus. Almost certainly the contract will contain penalty clauses to mitigate the financial impact but they at no stage made any negative public comment about their new partner.

They owned the problem in its entirety.

They also avoided the inclination to comment early without appropriate detail the minute things started going wrong, instead undertaking introspective review to rectify the problem.

In this regard they deserve credit and their humorous response is likely to like on longer than the memory of the angst of no chicken dinners.


The whole escapade reminded me of an incident many moons ago.

I led a Consultant Radiologist delivered community ultrasound service for a number of years.

It provided out of hours (evening and weekend) access to Radiologist Ultrasound Services within the community.

The service was well-received: wait times had reduced from 6 weeks to 6 days and reports were available the next morning day to the referring GP.


After a few years I was asked by the CCG to write the specification for the re-tendering exercise on the basis that ours was a model that worked and our service would in all likelihood be retained.


Instead, at interview stage the only aspect the CCG appeared interested in were the relative fee proposals of the shortlisted candidates; a firm submitted a highly attractive-seeming bid which consisted of impossible to deliver promises, and at the lowest fee proposal – and were thus selected.


When, not surprisingly, they failed to deliver on these promises and breached KPM after KPM, the CCG asked them to ask us to bail them out - suggesting a sub-tending of services under their contract (at our original fee structure). The pervading opinion allowed to flourish in the region was that the supplier had failed to adequately implement the required solution, and it was deemed important to ensure any remedial solution continued under the company banner.


So again, we have a working solution that was derailed by a chase to the bottom.

Reputation and efficiency sacrificed at the altar of parsimoniousness.

The difference however was failing to take responsibility for the situation even to the extent of seeking to mask the remedial measures. The supplier was allowed to carry all the blame and was allowed suffer reputational damage.


I’m sure you can supply myriad similar anecdotes.


So what lessons can we learn from the way KFC managed this problem?

  1. Do not ignore the benefits of specialist suppliers and base solutions purely on price
  2. Ensure that the proposals in any bid are realistic and deliverable
  3. Have a considered review of any adverse situation before making public comments
  4. Own the problem – do not sacrifice the provider to protect your own role in the situation
Categories: Blog

Dr Rizwan Malik

Dr Rizwan Malik. MBBS MA(Cantab) FRCR Dr Malik is a consultant radiologist at Royal Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, where he is Divisional Medical Director and Associate CCIO. Prior to this he was the Trust PACS and Imaging Lead, Divisional Clinical Governance Lead, as well as Clinical Lead for Radiology. He is also the Clinical Lead for the Greater Manchester Collaborative Imaging Procurement Project. Dr Rizwan Malik Dr Rizwan Malik Recognised as a leading Digital Health thinker in the NHS, his agenda setting blog posts on LinkedIn are closely followed by both Industry and NHS colleagues. He is an invited International Speaker at conferences about PACS and around the role of AI in Imaging in particular. Curator for UKIO informatics workstream 2018 & 2019 where he aimed to diversify the range of presentations and engage the supplier community in shared learning activities, he is now the Vice President (Industry Liaison) for UKIO. He provides mentorship and strategic steer to a number of Health IT companies. He is Clinical Advisor for InHealth reporting, and has previously worked in the role of Medical Advisor for Wellbeing Software. After completing his medical training at the University of Cambridge; United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy’s & St Thomas’ in London; and Manchester’s Radiology Training Scheme Dr Mallik took up his post at Bolton in 2006 as a general radiologist with subspecialty interests in chest, nuclear medical radiology, developing a particular interest in healthcare informatics. In addition he has experience in medico-legal reporting and a history of working closely with primary care colleagues to establish community radiology services.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *